[Open-FCoE] [PATCH] Separate lport rport retry counts

Love, Robert W robert.w.love at intel.com
Thu Apr 16 16:22:17 UTC 2009


Abhijeet Arvind Joglekar (abjoglek) wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: devel-bounces at open-fcoe.org
>> [mailto:devel-bounces at open-fcoe.org] On Behalf Of Abhijeet
>> Arvind Joglekar (abjoglek)
>> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:53 PM
>> To: devel at open-fcoe.org
>> Subject: [Open-FCoE] [PATCH] Separate lport rport retry counts
>> 
>> The following patch separates the lport and rport max retry
>> counts, so that they can be configured separately.
>> 
>> Rob had reviewed and Ok'ed this patch, but it never got applied to
>> the 
>> 2.6.29-rc4 based fcoe-fixes tree.
>> 
>> Re-sending patch after rebasing to fcoe-fixes-v2.6.29-rc6
>> 
>> ---
>> 
>> Abhijeet Joglekar (1):
>>       libfc,fcoe,fnic: Separate rport and lport max retry counts
>> 
>> 
>>  drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_sw.c   |    1 +
>>  drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c |    2 +-
>>  include/scsi/libfc.h          |    1 +
>>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> 
>> --
>> Signature
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel at open-fcoe.org
>> http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> 
> Robert,
> 
> You had ok'ayed this patch, and had said that you would apply it to
> the fcoe-features tree and would submit to scsi along with other
> feature patches (instead of fix tree and submitting with fixes since
> it was not a fix).
> 
> I think this patch never got applied to the features tree and so
> missed the FIP etc features commit. I also don't see it queued up in
> patchwork. Could you please pick this up?
> 
> -- abhijeet

Yes, I'll make sure this gets taken care of. I'm putting all patches for
-rc in the fcoe-fixes tree though, so you should look there.



More information about the devel mailing list