[Open-FCoE] [fcoemon PATCH v2 00/11] rfcoemon restructuring

Shyam_Iyer at Dell.com Shyam_Iyer at Dell.com
Thu Dec 17 19:49:15 UTC 2009



> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel-bounces at open-fcoe.org [mailto:devel-bounces at open-fcoe.org]
> On Behalf Of Mike Christie
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:05 AM
> To: open-iscsi at googlegroups.com
> Cc: eric.w.multanen at intel.com; devel at open-fcoe.org
> Subject: Re: [Open-FCoE] [fcoemon PATCH v2 00/11] rfcoemon
> restructuring
> 
> Shyam_Iyer at Dell.com wrote:
> > Shouldn't the requirement to administer DCB  be FCoE independent ?
> After
> > all DCB is required for other protocols like iscsi as well.
> >
> 
> It is not required for iscsi. I think people are thinking it is going
> to
> be useful for iscsi though.

Uh Ok.. I meant DCB would be useful for both FCoE and iSCSI. On the
other hand it is a requirement for FCoE.




More information about the devel mailing list